Deciphr Academy
Track 5 · Module 24 · Lesson 5 of 7 · 8 min read

What goes into a crypto treasury policy, and what controls stop one person moving the money?

Short answer

A written treasury policy sets the goals, who may do what, which assets and limits are allowed, and how results are reported; ENS DAO's 2026 investment policy is one public example.1 Controls such as separation of duties and multisig approvals mean no one person can move the money alone.2,3

Policyapproved by the boardProposefinance leadApproveother signersPayfrom the multisigChecksomeone elsesets the rulesmonthly reportNo one person can propose, approve and check alone
Fig. 5. A policy sets the rules. Separate people propose, approve and check, and a report closes the loop.

Written down, and approved at the top

Both public company examples in lesson 1 rested on a written policy approved at board level. MicroStrategy's board adopted its Treasury Reserve Policy on 11 September 2020.4 Tesla said its January 2021 investment policy was approved by the audit committee of its board.5

DAOs write policies too, and many publish them on their governance forums. ENS DAO's investment policy statement (IPS) for its endowment was updated by a vote that passed in June 2026.1,6 An IPS is a written policy that sets a treasury's goals, risk limits, allowed assets, roles and reporting.1

What one DAO's policy covers

ENS's 2026 IPS is long, but its parts are a useful checklist. They are one DAO's choices, not rules for everyone:1

Part What ENS's policy says
Goals Preserve capital over the long term and earn enough to support operating costs.1
Risk Risk tolerance is "moderate-to-low"; the risks named are failing to meet cash needs and losing principal.1
Liquidity At least three years of operating expenses in stablecoins, ahead of every other target.1
Allowed assets Listed stablecoins, ETH and liquid staked ETH, and some tokenised funds.1
Limits Caps per protocol, on tokenised funds and on permissioned providers, and no ETH on centralised exchanges.1
Reporting Monthly reports, an annual review and a live dashboard.1
Review Reviewed every year, and amended only after a public discussion and a vote.1

Policies keep changing. On 23 October 2026, KPK posted a draft amendment that would let the endowment use options as part of its regular rebalancing, within set limits: it would earn a fee for agreeing in advance the price of a trade it would make anyway. It was still a draft, not yet voted on, when this lesson was updated.7

Who does what

A policy names who decides and who acts. Under ENS's IPS, the DAO sets the goals and limits, reviews results at least once a year, and can appoint or fire the manager. KPK, the manager, invests within those limits and reports every month.1

Arbitrum DAO split the work on its STEP programme in a similar way: a committee reviewed applicants, a programme manager monitored the chosen products, and the DAO voted on the committee's choices.8

Separation of duties

The US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) describes separation of duties as the principle that no one user should have enough power to misuse a system alone.2 Its example: the person who authorises a paycheck should not also be the one who prepares it.2 It gives the two-person rule as one way to do this.2

A multisig wallet builds this rule into the account, as Module 9 explains. When ENS sold ETH in 2025, it used a separate Safe that needed 3 signatures, with signers representing the DAO, its endowment manager, ENS Labs and a DAO working group.3 ENS's IPS lists "multi-sig controls" and limited, scoped permissions among its controls against day-to-day mistakes.1

Rules that protect the runway

A policy can also say what may not happen without a vote. Under ENS's IPS, any withdrawal that would take the stablecoins below the three-year floor needs a separate DAO vote.1 Its runway is checked every week.1

Examples, not rules

Nothing in this lesson is a recommendation. The policies here belong to the organisations named, and each one changed over time. Each one was written for that organisation's own situation.1,4

Our viewA policy you only read when something goes wrong has already failed. The best ones are short enough that the people signing payments actually know what they say.
Sources
  1. [EP 6.46] [Social] 2026 Endowment Investment Policy Update. ENS DAO governance documents (posted on the ENS forum on 8 May 2026; status: passed, in a Snapshot vote held from 24 to 29 June 2026), June 2026.
  2. Glossary: separation of duty. US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Computer Security Resource Center (read 24 October 2026).
  3. [EP 6.1] [Executable] Convert 6,000 ETH to USDC for DAO Operating Expenses (proposal and execution updates). ENS DAO governance forum (proposal posted by karpatkey, later KPK), 24 January 2025, with updates to 13 May 2025.
  4. MicroStrategy Incorporated, Form 8-K (Item 8.01). Filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, 14 September 2020.
  5. Tesla, Inc. annual report (Form 10-K) for 2020. Filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, 8 February 2021.
  6. KPK H1 2026 Review for the ENS Endowment. KPK (the ENS Endowment manager), ENS DAO governance forum, 14 August 2026.
  7. [Draft] [Social] IPS Amendment No. 1: Endowment Options Overlay. KPK, ENS DAO governance forum (a draft; not voted on when read on 24 October 2026), 23 October 2026.
  8. Non-Constitutional: Stable Treasury Endowment Program 2.0. Arbitrum DAO governance forum (proposal; on-chain vote from 28 January 2025), first posted 17 September 2024.

General education built from the publicly available sources listed above. Not financial, legal, tax or investment advice. Naming a company, project or regulator is not an endorsement either way. Last checked 2026-10-24. Terms and disclaimer.